Debate contribution: Holding Ministers to Account

Debate contribution by Mr Gerry Carroll on .

MLA
Mr Gerry Carroll
Party at the time
People Before Profit Alliance
Date
10 November 2025
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Opposition Business
Heading
Holding Ministers to Account
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5225130

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I thank the Member for giving way. I said both things in my comments. I said that he should not have gone to Israel and that doing so should be enough for him to go from office, but I also stated that he broke the ministerial code and blurred the lines when it came to actions that he should not have taken as a Minister who represents everybody. I mentioned both things today.

73 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.17 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.95).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.07No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.06No
Dog-whistle messaging0.04No
Controversy escalation0.53No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.18No
Overall judgement0.17At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.95
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.02
Adopts it0.03
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.80
Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice)0.08
Another identity-related subject0.05
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.04
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.03

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 13:43 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification