Member's statement: Minister of Education
Member's statement by Mr Danny Baker on .
- MLA
- Mr Danny Baker
- Party at the time
- Sinn Féin
- Date
- 10 November 2025
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Minister of Education
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5224905
Read the official Assembly record
Text
For a long time, we have had no confidence in the Minister of Education. Arrogance, incompetence and financial mismanagement have been the hallmark of Paul Givan's time in office. He blames everyone but himself. Just last week, the Education Authority (EA) informed parents and education other than at school (EOTAS) staff via social media that the price of school dinners was to increase by 20%, referrals to EOTAS were to stop and children were to be locked out of music programmes. Owing to the Minister's mismanagement and ideology, the Lagan Valley Education Project in my constituency will be forced to close its doors. For decades, that organisation has helped young people on their last chance by educating them outside of school. That, coupled with the uncertainty that families face with school transport and the hike in the price of music programmes, shows that we need a Minister for all children. Instead, we have a Minister who wants to build a regressive education system that will harm our young people by removing coursework and AS levels and setting up a one-off high-stakes exam. We have a Minister who took a trip to Florida to promote his agenda while children with special educational needs had no school places and who ignored the Education Committee's proposals, which would have cut uniform costs and ensured that girls could wear trousers if they wanted. The Minister has spent money on vanity projects. He spent a quarter of a million pounds on a pilot scheme for mobile phone pouches: how many school meals would that have covered? There is a litany of failures by the Minister. However, the past two weeks have been the straw that broke the camel's back. He championed the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and went to Israel and visited a school in an illegally occupied territory, using departmental resources to promote the whitewashing of genocide. At the same time, schools here are being told that they cannot spend their budgets. The Minister has lost the confidence of teachers, unions, pupils and parents. He attempts to overwhelm our school leaders with consultations and surveys. If he continues down the path of destruction, it will take years to rectify the damage. He is a lame-duck Minister, and he needs to go.
377 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not qualifying”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.24 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.68).
- No identity-based framing was identified (0.56).
- Subject area: Education structures, integration and community division.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-qualifying threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.10 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.06 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.07 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.11 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.58 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.68 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.24 | At or below not-qualifying threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 0.56 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.01 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.21 |
| Adopts it | 0.22 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Education structures, integration and community division | 0.28 |
| Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups | 0.25 |
| Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits | 0.19 |
| Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues | 0.15 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.08 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 13:43 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.