Debate contribution: PSNI Support at London Protest
Debate contribution by Mr Trevor Clarke on .
- MLA
- Mr Trevor Clarke
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 6 October 2025
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Question for Urgent Oral Answer
- Heading
- PSNI Support at London Protest
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5157031
Read the official Assembly record
Text
I thank the Minister for coming to the House to tell us today about her role in operational policing. That has been useful. Is she concerned, like some of us on these and other Benches, that Members are insinuating that it is unfair for the police to police parades that support proscribed organisations?
53 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.57 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- The text reports, quotes or asks about the framing rather than adopting it (0.66).
- Subject area: Parades, bonfires and commemorations.
- The overall probability was moderate at most and none of the culture-war criteria was close to being met.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.31 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.10 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.46 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.43 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.36 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.25 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.57 | Between thresholds |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing | 0.15 |
| Reports or questions it (chosen) | 0.66 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.01 |
| Adopts it | 0.18 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.80 |
| Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism | 0.10 |
| Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations | 0.07 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.02 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 13:23 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.