Topical question AQT 1633/22-27

Topical question by Mr Doug Beattie MC on 6 October 2025.

MLA: Mr Doug Beattie MC
Party at the time: Ulster Unionist Party
Date: 6 October 2025
Type: Topical question
Assembly reference: AQT 1633/22-27
Business: Oral Answers to Questions
Assembly identifier: Official Report component 5156968

Text

Mr Beattie asked the Minister of Health whether his Department has carried out any assessment of the use of potentially harmful alternative medical drugs, which are not covered by the puberty blocker ban, to suppress the effects of puberty.

39 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Follow-ups by the same MLA in the Chamber

These were assessed together with this record:

6 October 2025 – I thank the Minister for his answer. GenderGP, which is based in Singapore, is promoting alternatives to puberty…

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.10 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.90).
No identity-based framing was identified (0.92).
Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
Question	Probability	Met?
Identity framing	0.04	No
Sectarian or communal antagonism	0.02	No
Cultural grievance politics	0.01	No
Dog-whistle messaging	0.07	No
Controversy escalation	0.05	No
Legitimate policy scrutiny	0.90	Yes
Overall judgement	0.10	At or below not-flagging threshold

Context and attribution (stance)
Option	Probability
No identity-based framing (chosen)	0.92
Reports or questions it	0.03
Criticises or condemns it	0.01
Adopts it	0.04

Subject area (top five)
Subject	Probability
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues	0.96
No identity-related subject	0.04
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials	0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations	0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy	0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 13:20 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification