Debate contribution: Skills Gaps between Young People and Businesses

Debate contribution by Mrs Michelle Guy on .

MLA
Mrs Michelle Guy
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
30 September 2025
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Skills Gaps between Young People and Businesses
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5142949

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I really love this motion. It has ambition, it seeks to emulate best practice, and it is focused on giving young people hope and opportunity and, in some circumstances, a reason to stay in Northern Ireland. That speaks to me both as a parent and as an elected representative. When asked what motivates me to be in politics, my answer is often that I want Northern Ireland to be a place that my kids do not have to leave to be successful. To realise that ambition, we need exciting, dynamic and innovative educational and training opportunities that cater for different aptitudes and interests of learners, matched to the needs of businesses and critical public services, such as healthcare. Right now, those opportunities simply are not there in the way that we would like, and I caution against anyone seeking to demonise young people as lazy or unmotivated when the pathways to succeed simply are so limited. I especially want to highlight, as others have done, young people with special educational needs and disabilities, who often need extra support to realise their potential. Right now, they have limited opportunities available. Northern Ireland continues to have the largest disability employment gap of all the regions across the United Kingdom. The latest figures report that the employment rate for disabled people in Northern Ireland is 38·3%, while the rate for those without a disability is 85·9%. Addressing the needs of those young people must be central to any approach, and I echo the recognition of Alma White and her work on Caleb's Cause, which highlights the neglect of our post-19 SEN young people. The motion recognises that some great work has happened in linking business investment with skills development. We have seen that through the skills academies, for example. However, every Member, when we go into local businesses, will hear that we have huge skills gaps that are stifling growth. When we take that fact and set it beside the fact that we have 25,000 16- to 24-year-olds not in education, employment or training, we have to see that for what it is, a red flag telling us that we need to do something different if we are to meet this challenge. It has never been more important to get the structures right around skills development. Things are changing so fundamentally with AI that it is impossible for government, which reacts slowly, to respond quickly enough to the needs of businesses and other industries. That is why the motion proposes a talent development agency to emulate Skillnet in the South. We have a huge number of innovative businesses that want to develop staff. They want to build skills and expand, however they need support to link with our training providers. We have also, time and again, talked about the need for parity of esteem between schools, further education and higher education. We need collaboration, not siloed working as we have now. That vision is driven by the top at ministerial level. The independent review of education provided clear recommendations for how that could be done and a vision of what could be achieved. For example, that report spoke of young people from the age of 14 onwards being able to participate in a wide range of education pathways, including vocational and technical education, and work-based learning. That requires collaboration between education providers and workplaces of all kinds. There are examples of that happening across Northern Ireland. Recently, David and I visited local manufacturing company Leprino in Magheralin, and we saw how it is bringing together young people through vocational opportunities, such as apprenticeships, as well as offering placements to university undergraduates and upskilling existing staff members to ensure that they have right mix of skills and experience to meet its business need. Not all businesses are at the scale to provide such a range of opportunities, so our version of the Skillnet model can provide a vital role, matching the needs of SMEs with trainees seeking employment opportunities or opportunities to learn. Seeking to leverage opportunities across the island of Ireland is a no-brainer, and we have spoken repeatedly about the need to work on a cross-border basis, especially in further and higher education. That will continue.

The SDLP amendment effectively removes the central tenet of the motion, which is a call on our Economy Minister to take focused action and establish a local agency here. There is nothing in our motion that would stop a talent development agency working in partnership with Skillnet Ireland. We would, of course, expect nothing else. We would also expect the talent development agency to work in partnership with similar organisations in Scotland, Wales and England. I hope that Members across the Chamber embrace the vision of the motion today. I worked in the private sector here for years in the technology sector, and I know the talent and vision of our business leaders, who are capable and eager to expand our economy. However, government must act as an enabler. Developing skills is essential and must be a shared aspiration for us all.

No problem. Thank you.

850 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.04 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.94).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.94).
  • Subject area: Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.05No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.03No
Controversy escalation0.02No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.94Yes
Overall judgement0.04At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.94
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.06
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits1.00
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 13:16 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification