Member's statement: Seachtain Deonaithe Orgán 2025
Member's statement by Mr Colm Gildernew on .
- MLA
- Mr Colm Gildernew
- Party at the time
- Sinn Féin
- Date
- 30 September 2025
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Seachtain Deonaithe Orgán 2025
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5142849
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Bhí Seachtain Deonaithe Orgán 2025 ar siúl an tseachtain seo caite; seachtain a dtugtar deis dúinn lena linn ár ndúthracht a athneartú do chinneadh a shábhálann beatha daoine. Is mór agam cúis an deonaithe orgán, nó ó bhuail mé le Dáithí Mag Gabhann agus lena mhuintir sa bhliain 2020, is mór agus is rómhór a chuaigh sé i bhfeidhm orm. Gheall muid dóibh go ndéanfaimis gach a raibh ar ár gcumas leis an dlí nua a chur i bhfeidhm, agus tá mé bródúil go ndearna muid, chomh maith le daoine eile, an gealltanas sin a chomhlíonadh. Cuireadh dlí Dháithí i bhfeidhm, agus is céim ollmhór chun tosaigh é. Ná bíodh aon amhras ann: tá dlí Dháithí ag sábháil beatha daoine. Ní hé sin deireadh an scéil, áfach: tá 163 dhuine ar ár liosta feithimh ó bhí anuraidh ann. Ó chuir an Roinn Sláinte stad sealadach le feachtais feasachta poiblí faoi láthair, tá sé ríthábhachtach go n-úsáidimidne, mar ionadaithe poiblí, ár nglór agus ár ngléas cainte le cúiseanna a shábhálann beatha daoine a chur chun cinn. Bhí dhá ghníomhphointe ann i Seachtain Deonaithe Orgán 2025: ní mór do dhaoine smaoineamh ar chlárú mar dheontóirí orgán; agus ní mór do dhaoine a mianta maidir lena n-orgáin a chur in iúl dá ngaolta.
210 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.71).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.02 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.03 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.71 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.03 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.73 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.18 |
| Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues | 0.04 |
| Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits | 0.03 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.01 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 13:16 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.