Topical question AQT 1573/22-27

Topical question by Mr Eóin Tennyson on .

MLA
Mr Eóin Tennyson
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
22 September 2025
Type
Topical question
Assembly reference
AQT 1573/22-27
Business
Oral Answers to Questions
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5123864

Read the official Assembly record

Text

Mr Tennyson asked the Minister for the Economy, given that she has reiterated her support for 80% renewable energy by 2030, which is a commitment that he shares, and that critical to that will be the delivery of the North/South interconnector, whether, for the avoidance of doubt, she and her Department support the interconnector being delivered as currently designed.

59 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Follow-ups by the same MLA in the Chamber

These were assessed together with this record:

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.18 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.88).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.92).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.04No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.06No
Controversy escalation0.07No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.88Yes
Overall judgement0.18At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.92
Reports or questions it0.06
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.02
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.88
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.05
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.05
Another identity-related subject0.02
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 13:11 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification