Member's statement: Heather Humphreys: Presidential Campaign
Member's statement by Mr Jonathan Buckley on .
- MLA
- Mr Jonathan Buckley
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 15 September 2025
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Heather Humphreys: Presidential Campaign
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5099136
Read the official Assembly record
Text
How many times has unionism been told of a mythical new Ireland that will be inclusive of all our cultures and traditions? How many times have we been told by Sinn Féin and the SDLP and by some quiet voices — they are getting louder — in the Alliance Party about that myth? Members may be aware that, at the weekend, Heather Humphreys launched her campaign for the Irish presidential election. In doing so, she described herself as a symbol of Ireland's tolerance and inclusivity towards Protestants and unionists. Heather is from County Monaghan, a place not far from here or the communities that I come from and represent, but one wonders if her perspective has been shaped and moulded by her place in the Dublin establishment politically, rather than the everyday lived experiences of the many Protestant families who live in border counties. For those families, the picture is very different. Their story has often been one of exclusion, quiet and vocal discrimination and gradual erasing. Whole communities, once vibrant and confident, have dwindled. The sharp decline in the Protestant population of border towns and villages has not been by accident; in many cases, it has been by design. It is the result of sustained social, cultural and, at times, violent pressures that are simply not acknowledged in the narratives presented by the Irish political class. Just two weeks ago, we paused to remember the anniversary of the Tullyvallen massacre, when five innocent Orangemen were murdered in cold blood by republican terrorists. Those wounds have not healed, and they should never be forgotten. We have a "Bury your head in the sand" approach from the Irish Government when it comes to legacy, facilitating and protecting terrorists who skipped across the border, terrorised communities and destroyed innocent lives. We have border bogs that still hold the bodies of certain individuals who have never had the comfort of a simple burial.
Over the weekend, it got worse, when a national newspaper had a sensationalist headline about Heather Humphreys's family's former Orange links. Is that the approach that republicans take to anybody from a unionist tradition? Has the mask slipped? Be assured that unionists know exactly how they would be treated in a so-called new, inclusive Ireland.
375 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations
Jev’s structured answers met every documented threshold for a qualifying culture-war activity.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.89 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
- Criteria met: Identity framing (0.97); Sectarian or communal antagonism (0.65); Cultural grievance politics (0.93); Dog-whistle messaging (0.81); Controversy escalation (0.73).
- The text adopts the identity-based framing in its own voice (0.99).
- Subject area: Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations.
- The text adopts an antagonistic or dog-whistle framing, which qualifies even alongside legitimate scrutiny.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.97 | Yes |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.65 | Yes |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.93 | Yes |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.81 | Yes |
| Controversy escalation | 0.73 | Yes |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.10 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.89 | Above qualifying threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing | 0.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.01 |
| Adopts it (chosen) | 0.99 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations | 0.96 |
| Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice) | 0.02 |
| Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism | 0.02 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.00 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 13:07 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.