Debate contribution: For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers: Equality Commission Response
Debate contribution by Miss Michelle McIlveen on .
- MLA
- Miss Michelle McIlveen
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 8 September 2025
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Oral Answers to Questions
- Heading
- For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers: Equality Commission Response
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5068344
Read the official Assembly record
Text
I thank the deputy First Minister for her answer. Does she unequivocally agree that the response continues to leave women feeling vulnerable in places where they should feel safe, such as in single-sex changing rooms and toilets, and that any ongoing uncertainty that is caused by that delay from the Equality Commission is deeply frustrating, given the recognition of the common-sense reality that that judgement provided?
66 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Part of an exchange
This follow-up belongs to: Topical question AQT 1504/22-27.
Assessment
Not analysed
This is the same MLA’s follow-up within the exchange on their own question. It is analysed together with that question and is not counted separately, so one question is never counted twice.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.