Topical question AQT 1503/22-27

Topical question by Mr Philip McGuigan on .

MLA
Mr Philip McGuigan
Party at the time
Sinn Féin
Date
8 September 2025
Type
Topical question
Assembly reference
AQT 1503/22-27
Business
Oral Answers to Questions
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5068333

Read the official Assembly record

Text

Mr McGuigan asked the First Minister and deputy First Minister whether they believe that the sickening displays of racist and sectarian hatred that we witnessed over the summer months on bonfires in Moygashel, Derry and elsewhere are legitimate expressions of culture or whether they will join him in unequivocally condemning those displays of hate and calling for those responsible for them to be held to account.

66 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Follow-ups by the same MLA in the Chamber

These were assessed together with this record:

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.15 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.97).
  • Subject area: Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.40No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.05No
Cultural grievance politics0.11No
Dog-whistle messaging0.20No
Controversy escalation0.17No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.53No
Overall judgement0.15At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it (chosen)0.97
Adopts it0.03
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.93
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.06
Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers0.01
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 01:20 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification