Debate contribution: Equal Protection: Justice Bill
Debate contribution by Mrs Naomi Long on .
- MLA
- Mrs Naomi Long
- Party at the time
- Alliance Party
- Date
- 24 June 2025
- Type
- Debate contribution (made as a minister)
- Business
- Oral Answers to Questions
- Heading
- Equal Protection: Justice Bill
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5046789
Read the official Assembly record
Text
The current law in Northern Ireland on the physical punishment of children is based on the concept of reasonable chastisement. Article 2 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Northern Ireland) Order 2006 has the effect of restricting the grounds on which the defence of reasonable chastisement can be used. In essence, that means that, if a parent or adult smacks a child and is prosecuted, they can defend themselves on the basis of reasonable chastisement but only if the harm is minor. Anything that causes more than transitory or minor discomfort is unlawful and can result in prosecution. Consequently, a mild smack is still legal in Northern Ireland. I met the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, which published a report in 2024 on the impact of physical punishment on children and young people. The report found that the use of physical punishment has a negative impact on children’s physical and mental health, as well as their social, emotional and behavioural outcomes. It also raised concerns that identifying abuse became a more subjective process for professionals, allowing abusers to hid behind the defence. That is why I fully support changing the law in Northern Ireland. However, the issues are broader than criminal justice alone, and any change to the law would require Executive agreement. Despite my best efforts and support from expert stakeholders, including Northern Ireland's Children's Commissioner, I have not been able to secure the Executive agreement needed to deliver a change in the law in that area in the Justice Bill. However, I will continue to seek the support my ministerial colleagues to repeal the defence of reasonable chastisement in Northern Ireland and move towards a position of equal protection.
283 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.04 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.95).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.03 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.01 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.03 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.95 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.04 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups | 0.41 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.40 |
| Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues | 0.18 |
| Another identity-related subject | 0.01 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 12:52 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.