Member's statement: Omagh Pride Parade: Gospel Hall Incident
Member's statement by Mr Tom Buchanan on .
- MLA
- Mr Tom Buchanan
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 16 June 2025
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Omagh Pride Parade: Gospel Hall Incident
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5010120
Read the official Assembly record
Text
I put on record my condemnation of an incident that occurred in Omagh on Saturday during the pride parade: a place of worship — Omagh Gospel Hall — was used by those parading as the subject of their mockery. A drag queen posing on the boundary wall at the front of the gospel hall, with the images posted all over social media, was not only shameful and provocative but downright disgraceful. That despicable act and blatantly provocative scene have caused deep offence, concern and hurt amongst many Bible-believing Christians. I was absolutely horrified, yet not surprised, when I saw such a blatant display of disrespect outside that place of worship. The pride movement claims to promote respect, compassion and tolerance, but where were they on Saturday? Its very actions contradicted the words that proceed out of their mouth. With pride, it appears to be a matter of, "You do what you are told, but we will do what we want". It must be called out for what it is. It cannot be ignored or excused. Today, I call on the Parades Commission, which gave the green light for this event in Omagh, to carefully consider that action, which is the cause of much offence amongst many in our communities. Over the years, we have become all too familiar with the strict principles of respect and sensitivity placed on loyal orders by the Parades Commission on parades in the vicinity of places of worship. Therefore, the same standards must apply to pride, and that incident cannot be ignored or brushed under the carpet. I also call on the National Lottery and Fermanagh and Omagh District Council, which provided funding for the event, to take careful cognisance of the situation in considering any future funding of events of that nature in Omagh. I say to the organisers of the pride parade that such actions of disrespect and mockery will never be tolerated and will be continually called out for what they are. I also call on the organisers of the parade to issue a public apology for the hurt caused to so many Bible-believing Christians and others on Saturday at that event. I remind them that the word of God tells us:
"for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap."
380 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues
Jev’s structured answers met every documented threshold for a qualifying culture-war activity.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.81 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
- Criteria met: Identity framing (0.89); Cultural grievance politics (0.90); Dog-whistle messaging (0.67); Controversy escalation (0.87).
- The text adopts the identity-based framing in its own voice (0.82).
- Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
- The text adopts an antagonistic or dog-whistle framing, which qualifies even alongside legitimate scrutiny.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.89 | Yes |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.58 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.90 | Yes |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.67 | Yes |
| Controversy escalation | 0.87 | Yes |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.24 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.81 | Above qualifying threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing | 0.03 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.15 |
| Adopts it (chosen) | 0.82 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues | 0.67 |
| Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice) | 0.30 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.02 |
| Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations | 0.01 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 12:48 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.