Debate contribution: Government Peformance
Debate contribution by Mr Matthew O'Toole on .
- MLA
- Mr Matthew O'Toole
- Party at the time
- Social Democratic and Labour Party
- Date
- 27 May 2025
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Oral Answers to Questions
- Heading
- Government Peformance
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4972409
Read the official Assembly record
Text
The reason that I ask, First Minister, is that your party is making robust criticisms, many of which, perhaps, are legitimate, about performance in the South, but when it comes to social housing in the North, the Chartered Institute of Housing has warned today that there could be a £100 million shortfall in social housing investment. There is no plan for investing in waste water. In fact, there is denial from your colleagues that there is even a problem. There are chaotic, contradictory statements on the delivery of North/South infrastructure. You mentioned the lack of fiscal powers here, but your colleague the Finance Minister does not seem to want to take any new fiscal powers. Why is there a contradiction and a difference between the robust way that your party holds the Government to account in the South and the idea that you simply want people in the North to accept inaction and drift?
154 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Part of an exchange
This follow-up belongs to: Topical question AQT 1341/22-27.
Assessment
Not analysed
This is the same MLA’s follow-up within the exchange on their own question. It is analysed together with that question and is not counted separately, so one question is never counted twice.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.