Debate contribution: British-Irish Council: Environment

Debate contribution by Mr Andrew Muir on .

MLA
Mr Andrew Muir
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
27 May 2025
Type
Debate contribution (made as a minister)
Business
Ministerial Statement
Heading
British-Irish Council: Environment
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4972046

Read the official Assembly record

Text

With your permission, Mr Speaker, I wish to make a statement in compliance with section 52 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998, regarding the seventeenth British-Irish Council (BIC) environment work sector meeting, which was held in Kew Gardens in London on Thursday 8 May of this year. Junior Minister Aisling Reilly MLA, junior Minister Pam Cameron MLA and I represented the Northern Ireland Executive at the meeting. The report has been endorsed by junior Ministers Reilly and Cameron, and they agreed that I should make the statement. The British-Irish Council was established in 1999 and is a forum for its members to discuss, consult and use best endeavours to reach agreement and cooperation on matters of mutual interest within the competence of its member Administrations. The British-Irish Council environment work sector is led by the UK Government and has proved to be a constructive and unique forum for facilitating evidence exchange and practical collaboration since the Council was established. During the meeting, Ministers discussed and reviewed the work of the environment work sector from 2020 to 2024. The meeting also focused on restructuring the environment work sector. It was chaired by Mary Creagh MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State and Minister for Nature, and involved Ministers from Ireland and the devolved Administrations of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland as well as the Governments of the Isle of Man, Jersey and Guernsey. Ministers discussed and reviewed the environment work sector 2020-24 policy report and the activities of its subgroups — the invasive non-native species; the Asian hornet task force; marine litter marine environment; and climate adaptation — across the period. We commended the work undertaken and the value of shared cooperation on each of those areas. Ministers agreed that the 'Environment Work Sector Policy Report 2020-24' would be published. Ministers also agreed to the streamlining of the environment work sector, confirming the closure of the marine litter, marine environment and climate adaptation subgroups following the conclusion of their work plans and the mainstreaming of climate action across the British-Irish Council thematic programme. Ministers affirmed the importance of continued collaboration across Administrations to combat the growing threat of invasive species. We agreed that the invasive non-native species and the Asian hornet task force subgroups would combine and be elevated into a separate invasive species work sector led by the UK Government. Ministers reviewed and endorsed a new work plan for the invasive species work sector, with a focus on the following priority areas: monitoring and surveillance technology; priority pathways — exotic pets; awareness raising; alerts and rapid response; and Asian hornets, which are yellow-legged hornets. Ministers also considered future priorities for the environment work sector, with agreement to make the circular economy as the immediate topic of focus led by the UK Government. Ministers tasked officials to develop a work sector plan on the circular economy for future consideration in the second half of 2025. I commend the statement to the Assembly and welcome any questions.

The publication of that sits with the British-Irish Council, but I will follow it up and request that it is promptly published, because that is important. The circular economy was considered to be a relevant topic for future work. England, Scotland, Wales, the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man face similar challenges in regard to that, so it was felt that it was important that we should take that forward, and the UK Government are happy to do that. I said at the meeting that we also need to take into consideration the unique position of Northern Ireland in respect of the Windsor framework and how that fits in to it all. There are opportunities from the circular economy. There are great examples of businesses in Northern Ireland showing that in action, and, hopefully, we can learn from one another and drive forward more work on it. An element of the circular economy sits with the Department for the Economy. Obviously, it will be invited to future British-Irish Council meetings, if those topics are on the agenda.

We face an environmental catastrophe in Lough Neagh. It is a serious issue not just in respect of its impact on the environment but because 40% of our drinking water comes from Lough Neagh, so it is important that we face up to the actions that need to be taken around that. One of the specific issues that were discussed at the British-Irish Council in regard to Lough Neagh was zebra mussels. They are an invasive species and contribute to the issues that we face with Lough Neagh. The interventions that we can provide regarding that are rather limited. It is key that people ensure that, in any maritime operations, due diligence is taken to ensure that we do not spread the zebra mussels. The matter of invasive species is on the agenda of the British-Irish Council because it affects not just Northern Ireland but the South. We will continue to collaborate on that. Additional research on Lough Neagh has been published, and I will lay that in the Assembly Library for Members to access. The research is about the contribution to water quality, and hopefully it will aid consideration of the issues affecting Lough Neagh.

The statement is about the British-Irish Council environment sector, and I am glad to say that that cooperation occurs across all the member organisations of the British-Irish Council. We work collaboratively, which is good. On your question about the nutrients action programme, that is out for consultation. I took a decision to extend it by four weeks, and I encourage people to feed back alternative solutions to tackle the challenges that are in front of us or to raise any concerns about that. The consultation is just that: a consultation on proposals. I understand that it is complex, and that is why I agreed to extend the consultation by four weeks.

Thank you, John. My Department has worked with stakeholders to co-design policies, strategies and action plans that are needed to address the dual climate and biodiversity crises that face the marine environment. They include a revised marine protected area strategy and a blue carbon action plan. I launched the blue carbon action plan on 23 April, and the revised marine protected area strategy will be published later this year. That will be followed by the seabird and elasmobranch strategies.

I will follow up on that. That sits with the British-Irish Council, and I will seek to have it published as soon as possible.

Thank you, Michelle. Your Assembly question was useful in bringing out a bit more detail on the number of exotic pets that are registered in Northern Ireland. I continue to encourage people to register any exotic pets, because there is a requirement to do that. It is important that we recognise the risks to broader society if we do not properly manage that, and that is why it was agreed that it should be part of the work programme. Once the terms of reference are agreed, I will write to you to set them out. It is important that we do that. At the meeting, we discussed some of the information that we have gathered on the situation that has presented itself. We want to work collaboratively because, as you know, those pets are likely to travel throughout the areas that are within the remit of the British-Irish Council, and I am very conscious of the associated risks. Again, I urge people who are in possession of any of those animals to register them.

Thank you very much. That is an important area. The invasive species work sector will focus on monitoring and surveillance technology, developing new technology, including AI, for monitoring invasive species across the islands; priority pathways, including exotic pets, as we have just talked about, to address exotic pet escape and establishment of actions across British-Irish Council member Administrations; and prompting awareness-raising campaigns such as Be Plant Wise and Check Clean Dry and coordinating the annual Invasive Species Week. It also includes alerts and rapid responses and, as was discussed in the statement, preventing the spread of Asian hornets, which threaten honeybees, native invertebrates and human health.

Yes, it will. It was set out in the statements that were issued on Monday of last week that there will be further cooperation around those areas. That will be for the collective benefit of the EU, Northern Ireland and the UK more broadly. That is wise, because a lot of the issues that we are discussing with the British-Irish Council also extend to the European Union. It is important that we cooperate on those. I already cooperate quite a lot with my colleagues in the South, and I am seeking further engagement with my colleagues, particularly around Lough Neagh and nature recovery and also on agriculture and veterinary matters. That liaison already occurs, but the reset with the European Union allows us to broaden and deepen that collaboration. It is set out in the statement, and I welcome that particular paragraph.

I continue to undertake my responsibilities to the environment because they are statutory responsibilities that need to be discharged. It is important that we take cognisance of that. We also need to take cognisance of a report issued last week by the Office of Environmental Protection. It states:

"The Complaints and Investigation team service a wide range of enquiries and complaints. We have identified the following topics that are currently undergoing further consideration".

The first item in the list of future topics is:

"Northern Ireland – Nutrient Action Programme We are considering any potential failures to comply in relation to the regulation of nitrogen/phosphorus inputs into freshwater/coastal protected sites along with wider regulations relating to nutrients."

That is the context in which I operate, and I am very clear that the proposals for the nutrient action programme are just that: they are proposals. There is a commitment in the Programme for Government to tackle the issue of Lough Neagh. There is significant pressure, whether from the Office of Environmental Protection or others, to do that. I am striving to strike a balance between addressing those issues and concerns that are being set out to me and ensuring financial sustainability for the agri-food sector. That is something that I am very much committed to. I was the only Minister in the UK to secure ring-fenced funding for agriculture, agri-environment, fisheries and rural development. Additionally, I secured over £12 million for a just transition fund for agriculture. I am doing that work. I am delivering for the farming community, but I am also very conscious of my statutory responsibilities, which I cannot shirk.

I recently shared a copy of the Northern Ireland climate change adaptation programme with my ministerial colleagues and requested any final comments before my Department launches an eight-week consultation on it. Subject to no major concerns being raised, I hope to launch the consultation late this month or early next month.

That was not a matter for discussion for the environment work sector. I outlined in the statement what the meeting focused on. To be honest, Mr Gaston, I think that the EU lives rent-free in your brain.

There is an inaccuracy in your question: you said that only those areas could prosecute environmental crime. Northern Ireland can prosecute environmental crime, so it is important to set the record straight on that, Matthew.

The independent panel is continuing its work and will report in due course. I will not be found wanting in coming forward with my response to that. When the SDLP had a chance to vote for an environmental protection agency as part of an amendment to the Climate Change Bill, you did not even turn up.

1,958 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.10 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.78).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.96).
  • Subject area: Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.04No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.16No
Controversy escalation0.12No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.78Yes
Overall judgement0.10At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.96
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it0.01
Adopts it0.02
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.82
No identity-related subject0.18
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 01:20 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification