Member's statement: Foyle: Sectarian Violence

Member's statement by Mr Gary Middleton on .

MLA
Mr Gary Middleton
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
28 April 2025
Type
Member's statement
Business
Members' Statements
Heading
Foyle: Sectarian Violence
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4913815

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I rise with sadness and concern following a week of sectarianism and violence in my constituency of Foyle. On Easter Monday, we saw violence from republicans near the Fountain estate. Following the Easter Monday parade, petrol bombs, fireworks and masonry were thrown near an old people's home. At the weekend, we saw two young people targeted in the Nelson Drive area. Yesterday, there were arranged fights, with fireworks and masonry being thrown. A bus carrying young people from a cross-community tournament was targeted with stones and masonry. The murals in the Fountain estate were also targeted. It is deeply disappointing that that level of sectarianism still exists. I urgently call on those involved in it to stop what they are doing. It is unfortunate that we are seeing a rise in that activity, but the ultimate result of it will be serious injury, if not death. I urge those who have information to bring it to the PSNI. There is an onus on us all to show political leadership, and I welcome the condemnation of that activity across the board. It is not about finger-pointing at one section of the community. Sectarianism, unfortunately, blights all sections of our society. There is an onus on us to highlight that, so it is important that, today, we call it out for what it is and we urge those involved to bring it to an end and those with information to bring it to the PSNI.

243 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.07 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.96).
  • Subject area: Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.21No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.08No
Dog-whistle messaging0.05No
Controversy escalation0.06No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.31No
Overall judgement0.07At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.04
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it (chosen)0.96
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations1.00
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 12:27 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification