Member's statement: Global Intergenerational Week
Member's statement by Mr Nick Mathison on .
- MLA
- Mr Nick Mathison
- Party at the time
- Alliance Party
- Date
- 28 April 2025
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Global Intergenerational Week
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4913798
Read the official Assembly record
Text
I take the opportunity to highlight Global Intergenerational Week, a campaign that runs every year and aims to inspire us to embrace intergenerational practice and learn more about the benefits of connecting people of all ages. This year, it runs from 24 to 30 April, and, no doubt, there will be events taking place across many constituencies. Linking Generations Northern Ireland is a local charity based in my constituency. It does fantastic work in connecting generations and communities across Northern Ireland. Vicki, the charity's director, whom many Members will have engaged with, is incredibly passionate about the work that she does. She recently gave an excellent presentation at one of the Education Committee's informal stakeholder briefings. It covered, in particular, the multiple linkages that intergenerational practice has across the Northern Ireland curriculum. The charity offers continuing professional development (CPD)-accredited training in intergenerational practice and has a range of resources that can be used with primary, secondary and FE students. It can also provide training to care homes on developing intergenerational approaches alongside bespoke training sessions and workshops that are tailored to meet the needs of each specific audience. A great example of its work locally, which shows why we should take the time to acknowledge Global Intergenerational Week, comes when we see it working out practically on the ground. Little Stars Preschool in Killyleagh and Beechvale Nursing Home in Killinchy in the Strangford constituency regularly engage in a range of activities in the nursing home. The feedback, spanning the generations, from those engagements is that they are really positive experiences for young and old alike. As Global Intergenerational Week will come to a close on Wednesday, I pay tribute to the work of Linking Generations NI, which runs on a shoestring budget. It has extremely limited funding to deliver its work. Crucially, I also call on all Departments, particularly the Executive Office, to engage seriously with the value of intergenerational work, facilitate collaboration across the Executive and come together to ensure that the work is funded adequately, appropriately and sustainably. Organisations such as Linking Generations cannot exist on goodwill alone. An element of what they do needs to be funded if we want it to be delivered and to confirm that we value it. The work benefits our education system, our health settings and a range of key Executive strategies. Last year, a motion to support the progression of the loneliness strategy was passed unanimously in the Assembly, and intergenerational work is absolutely vital for that. If we are serious about the issue, we need to make sure that intergenerational practice is properly supported across all Executive Departments.
438 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.02 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.83).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- Subject area: Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.03 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.01 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.01 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.02 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.83 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.02 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups | 0.88 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.11 |
| Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues | 0.01 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 12:27 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.