Debate contribution: Bathing Water Quality
Debate contribution by Mr Andrew Muir on .
- MLA
- Mr Andrew Muir
- Party at the time
- Alliance Party
- Date
- 6 May 2025
- Type
- Debate contribution (made as a minister)
- Business
- Oral Answers to Questions
- Heading
- Bathing Water Quality
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4929696
Read the official Assembly record
Text
My Department carried out the most current official assessment of bathing water sites in Northern Ireland during the 2024 bathing season. The bathing season runs from 1 June to 15 September. During that period, weekly monitoring and assessments were carried out at 26 identified bathing water sites and seven candidate bathing water sites. I am pleased to report that Northern Ireland’s bathing waters performed well. All 26 identified bathing waters complied with the required bathing water quality standards. Twenty-two were classified as "excellent", a prerequisite for the coveted blue flag award and an indication of the highest water quality standard. Two met the "good" standard, and the remaining two met the "sufficient" standard. Seven candidate bathing waters were also monitored in 2024. The classification for those sites is preliminary and currently based on two years of data. One site was classified as "excellent", two as "good", three as "sufficient" and one as "poor". It should be noted that the addition of a second year of samples in 2024 led to some improvements in classification at those candidate sites, and a full four-year dataset is required to classify with confidence. It is my intention to formally identify the seven candidate sites before the commencement of the 2025 bathing season. My Department publishes the results for all identified and candidate bathing waters on the DAERA and nidirect websites.
226 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.02 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.01 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.01 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.01 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.01 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.01 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.32 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.02 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.98 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.02 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.00 |
| Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 12:26 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.