Member's statement: Northern Ireland Assembly Transgender Policy
Member's statement by Mr Timothy Gaston on .
- MLA
- Mr Timothy Gaston
- Party at the time
- Traditional Unionist Voice
- Date
- 12 May 2025
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Northern Ireland Assembly Transgender Policy
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4937389
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Like the Member who spoke earlier, I am deeply troubled that Parliament Buildings is hosting an event this afternoon entitled 'Nothing About Us Without Us — Trans Voices In The Halls Of Power'. Let me be clear: I do not object to debate or fear disagreement, but I do object to the forced endorsement of radical ideology under the guise of inclusion. To attend the event, individuals must accept the Rainbow Project's so-called code of conduct, a code that reflects the Assembly's own deeply flawed transgender policy, which explicitly states that biological males:
"are free to use the restrooms and facilities belonging to the gender with which they identify".
In plain language, that means that a man can use the ladies' toilets. It gets worse. The policy demands that official records reflect a person's chosen name and gender identity, regardless of biological reality. That guts our system of accountability and undermines basic scrutiny and security. What good are records if anyone can change their identity on a whim? Even more disturbingly, the policy allows complaints to be filed against anyone who fails to affirm a person's gender identity. This should be a place of free speech, but that is a policy of compelled speech. The Stormont guidance came into effect in 2023, seemingly without meaningful consultation, except, it seems, with the LGBT lobby groups. The equality screening form that I have unearthed claims that the policy does not affect people of faith or those with differing political views. What about Christians who believe that God made male and female? Well, our concerns are simply disregarded and brushed to the side. Those of us who are not on the transgender bandwagon are referred to the commissioner for investigation. Most gallingly of all, the screening form claims that the policy positively impacts women. Where are the voices of women? Who asked them whether they agreed to the scrapping of female-only spaces in this Building? Was legal advice sought? If so, it must have been pretty poor advice. The Supreme Court ruling has not changed the law; it has only reaffirmed it.
Single-sex protections remain in place, and Stormont must reflect that. The policy is not inclusive: it is intolerant and illegal and must be withdrawn immediately.
374 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues
Jev’s structured answers met every documented threshold for a qualifying culture-war activity.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.82 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
- Criteria met: Identity framing (0.77); Sectarian or communal antagonism (0.77); Dog-whistle messaging (0.95).
- The text adopts the identity-based framing in its own voice (0.93).
- Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
- The text adopts an antagonistic or dog-whistle framing, which qualifies even alongside legitimate scrutiny.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.77 | Yes |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.77 | Yes |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.21 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.95 | Yes |
| Controversy escalation | 0.54 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.40 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.82 | Above qualifying threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing | 0.05 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.02 |
| Adopts it (chosen) | 0.93 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues | 1.00 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.00 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 12:22 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.