Debate contribution: Northern Ireland Climate Commissioner Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2025

Debate contribution by Mr Robbie Butler on .

MLA
Mr Robbie Butler
Party at the time
Ulster Unionist Party
Date
8 April 2025
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Executive Committee Business
Heading
Northern Ireland Climate Commissioner Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2025
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4919335

Read the official Assembly record

Text

Would the Member like to reflect on her statement where she rolled all unionists into one? You talked about the DUP at the start of your statement, which was fine. However, we have not had the chance to speak in the debate yet, and you have just said, "unionists". Would you like to reflect on that statement, please?

58 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Uncertain: close call Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations

Uncertain: this record is published but not counted in any total.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.54 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
  • Criteria met: Identity framing (0.71); Controversy escalation (0.73).
  • The text reports, quotes or asks about the framing rather than adopting it (0.39).
  • Subject area: Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations.
  • The answers did not meet either automatic threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.71Yes
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.05No
Cultural grievance politics0.08No
Dog-whistle messaging0.16No
Controversy escalation0.73Yes
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.09No
Overall judgement0.54Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.32
Reports or questions it (chosen)0.39
Criticises or condemns it0.27
Adopts it0.02
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.70
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.22
Another identity-related subject0.07
No identity-related subject0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 12:21 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification