Debate contribution: State Pension Access: Terminally Ill People

Debate contribution by Mrs Linda Dillon on .

MLA
Mrs Linda Dillon
Party at the time
Sinn Féin
Date
31 March 2025
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
State Pension Access: Terminally Ill People
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4872091

Text

I beg to move

I thank the Minister for being here. The motion has a straightforward ask, which is that our Communities Minister supports the campaign that Marie Curie has led to ask the British Government to legislate to allow those with terminal diagnoses to have early access to their state pension. The motion speaks to the heart of compassion and dignity for people who have been given a terminal diagnosis. Earlier, upstairs in room 115, Marie Curie held an event with pharmacists to discuss "daffodil standards" for pharmacy, which relate to palliative care patients. If our community pharmacists, GPs and front-line workers can give those who are potentially in the last months of life some dignity and look after them, the least that we can expect from the British Government is to do likewise. People with terminal illness and their families should not be forced to endure the added burden of financial hardship as they approach the end of their lives. The system needs to support them, not abandon them. Across these islands, we like to think of ourselves as a compassionate society that cares for people in their final days, but, right now, the reality is far from that. People who have worked all their lives, paid into the system, raised families and paid taxes are being told that, despite facing a terminal diagnosis, they must wait until pension age to access the very support that they have contributed to. That is indefensible and is why we are proposing the motion today. Marie Curie's recent report 'Dying in Poverty' paints a harrowing picture. It reveals that, every year, about 2,500 people across the North die in poverty, with one in four terminally ill people of working age dying below the poverty line. Behind those numbers are human beings — mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, children — who should spend their final months surrounded by family, not worrying about how to heat their homes or put food on the table.

Let me be clear: it is a political choice. If the British Government can find billions for bombs and weapons, they can find the relatively small amount needed to ensure that terminally ill people do not die in poverty but can access the pension that they have worked for all their life. Marie Curie has shown that allowing terminally ill people early access to the state pension would cost just 0·1% of the state pension budget; in other words, it is entirely affordable. Not only is it affordable, but it is happening elsewhere. Similar schemes exist in France, Germany and Italy, and, in the rest of Ireland, a disability pension can be accessed. Those Governments recognise that people at the end of life should not be punished by bureaucracy but protected by it. For that reason, the motion asks the Communities Minister to engage directly with the British Government to support the Marie Curie campaign. At a time when the British Government are attacking access to benefits for those who are sick and disabled, we need them to take the lead on the issue. We cannot excuse inaction, and it must not prevent us from raising our voices and advocating change. I acknowledge the important work of my colleague, former Minister for Communities Deirdre Hargey, who took decisive action during her time in office to extend access to the personal independence payment (PIP) for people diagnosed with a terminal illness. That significant and compassionate intervention made a real difference in people's lives. We need to build on the foundations laid by Deirdre. Her work showed what is possible when a Government put people first. It is our responsibility to continue that work and to go further in ensuring that terminally ill people are treated with dignity and have the financial security that they deserve right to the end. As the late Archbishop Desmond Tutu once said, we talk about the right to live, but we must also talk about the "right to die with dignity". That dignity is found not in spreadsheets or statistics but in how we treat people when they are at their most vulnerable. It is in whether we choose to stand by them or turn away, and, right now, too many are being failed by a British Government who have little in the way of a moral and compassionate approach to people anywhere across these islands. The Health Committee inquiry into palliative care has already highlighted significant gaps between the policy approach to palliative care in the Twenty-six Counties and the lack of policy, strategy and funding for people with palliative care and end-of-life needs in the North. The British Government have an opportunity to narrow the poverty gap for people at the end of life. Today, I call on the Minister for Communities to engage directly with the Department for Work and Pensions to press the British Government to make the necessary legislative and administrative changes to allow early access to the state pension for those with a terminal diagnosis. We must speak with one voice in support of those who are too often unheard. It is about doing what is right: ensuring that we look after those with a terminal diagnosis, their families and the people whom they love. It is about ensuring that people spend their final months not in stress, fear and poverty but in peace, dignity and security. Let us call on the British Government to show real compassion and act on that compassion. I urge the Minister to take that message directly to the British Government. I acknowledge that it is not something that you are able to do within your budget, which is why Marie Curie is carrying out its campaign across these islands and has brought it to Westminster. I ask you, Minister, to do the same.

969 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not qualifying

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not qualifying”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.05 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.96).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • Subject area: Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-qualifying threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.06No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.03No
Controversy escalation0.03No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.96Yes
Overall judgement0.05At or below not-qualifying threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits1.00
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 12:16 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification