Debate contribution: Ketamine: Reclassification

Debate contribution by Ms Connie Egan on .

MLA
Ms Connie Egan
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
11 March 2025
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Ketamine: Reclassification
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4855771

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I will start today, as many others have, by paying tribute to Sandra Larmour and her family's campaign to raise awareness on the issue of ketamine, as the motion rightly references. Jeni Larmour, her daughter, sadly passed away after consuming ketamine and alcohol, and Sandra has channelled her grief into tirelessly lobbying and raising awareness. She has publicly said that she does not want Jeni's death to become just another statistic reported on, and I could not agree more. I welcome the opportunity that has been given by the UK Government and the Home Office for a review of the reclassification of ketamine as a class A substance. I agree with the motion. We must facilitate affected families and loved ones being involved in the review. In fact, I will go further and say that previous users or victims of harm relating to ketamine must also be consulted to ensure a truly wrap-around interventionist and preventionist approach to drug use policy frameworks. As mentioned by others around the Chamber today, legal frameworks relating to the misuse of drugs are a reserved matter, particularly looking at the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016. Responsibility for the legislation is for Westminster and the Home Office. However, with that being said, it would be remiss of me not to recognise, as others have done, that all Executive Ministers, including the Justice and Health Ministers, have a responsibility to take any action they can to minimise and end the harm created by drugs. The opportunity for a review of the classification of ketamine is a welcome one. It is a highly dangerous substance, as my colleague Joanne Bunting pointed out earlier, and it is becoming increasingly popular among our younger communities. It has also often been found in the systems of victims of spiking, which is a legal area where our Justice Minister, Naomi Long, is key to strengthening. There have been record levels of use of ketamine in recent years. Home Office statistics estimate that 269,000 people aged between 16 and 59 used ketamine from March 2023 to March 2024. Something that, I thought, would be useful to pull out is that data on users and dealers of ketamine specifically in Northern Ireland is hard to track, and a contributing factor to that is the general class B category it goes under in our reporting systems, instead of having its own specific offence code. In the outworkings of the review, it would be really interesting to explore how, operationally, in Northern Ireland, if it was segmented into a class A substance, we could aggregate police data into a wider, more accurate picture. That would be absolutely vital to producing tangible results, tracking and preventing further use and harm. If class A status is achieved through the review, it will mean that possession of ketamine will result in seven years of prison time instead of five, but the real change will be lifelong imprisonment for supply and production instead of 14 years. Affected families and stakeholders must be consulted on those changes to affirm public confidence to our UK-wide approach. However, within all that, the Alliance Party position is that the 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act is outdated and needs reviewed in the long term. As my party colleague Danny Donnelly MLA and others in the Chamber have outlined, we need to look at other ways of supporting vulnerable people who find themselves addicted to substances. The 2021 Northern Ireland Executive substance use strategy, 'Preventing Harm, Empowering Recovery: A Strategic Framework to Tackle the Harm from Substance Use', which was led by the Department of Health, highlighted the need for harm reduction, joined-up working, early intervention and support for recovery. I know that the Justice Minister is committed to playing her part in reducing offending, working with the PSNI to respond to community safety concerns and empowering recovery through supporting alternative approaches such as the substance misuse courts. We need to ensure that our approach to drug misuse is as person-focused as possible. The review of reclassification opens up an opportunity to discuss those matters further. Stakeholder involvement, including families who have lost loved ones and users who are themselves in recovery, must play a key role in that. I finish by thanking Sandra Larmour again for putting the matter on MLAs' agendas and for her tireless work to ensure that no other family has to endure the pain of losing their loved one.

745 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.94).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.02No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.02No
Controversy escalation0.02No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.94Yes
Overall judgement0.03At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.86
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.08
Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits0.02
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.02
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 12:15 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification