Debate contribution: GP Indemnity Arrangements
Debate contribution by Mr Eóin Tennyson on .
- MLA
- Mr Eóin Tennyson
- Party at the time
- Alliance Party
- Date
- 18 February 2025
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Oral Answers to Questions
- Heading
- GP Indemnity Arrangements
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4806388
Read the official Assembly record
Text
I thank the Minister for that update, though I suspect that, given the end of his answer, he will not answer this next question: what is the rationale for excluding locum and sessional GPs from the proposed indemnity scheme? Is it not the case that, by excluding those GPs, those costs will be passed on to practices and will therefore undermine the stabilising effect of any scheme?
67 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Part of an exchange
This follow-up belongs to: Oral question AQO 1573/22-27.
Assessment
Not analysed
This is the same MLA’s follow-up within the exchange on their own question. It is analysed together with that question and is not counted separately, so one question is never counted twice.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.