Member's statement: Lá an Idirlín Shábháilte
Member's statement by Mr Colm Gildernew on .
- MLA
- Mr Colm Gildernew
- Party at the time
- Sinn Féin
- Date
- 11 February 2025
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Lá an Idirlín Shábháilte
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4793276
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Inniu Lá an Idirlín Shábháilte, lá a thugann deis dúinn ár machnamh a dhéanamh ar an tionchar atá ag an idirlíon orainn agus ar na rioscaí atá ann dár sochaí. Tá an t-idirlíon fite fuaite inár saol. Is air a bhíonn muid ag brath go mór i gcúrsaí gach aon lae: is air a dhéanann muid ár gcomhfhreagras; is uaidh a fhaigheann muid ár nuacht; agus is minic gur ar líne a dhéanann muid caidreamh le daoine eile. Ceanglaíonn an t-idirlíon le chéile sinn, ach má cheanglaíonn féin, tá contúirt ann fosta. Tá fás fíochmhar faoin intleacht shaorga, agus, má tá buntáistí móra ag baint léi, is maith is eol dúinne sa tSeomra seo an dochar a thig léi a dhéanamh fosta. Tá na domhainbhrionnuithe, an bhréagnuacht, na camscéimeanna ar líne agus an chibearmhaistíneacht uile ag dul i méid. Is athair beirt bhuachaillí atá sna déaga mé, agus cuireann na forbairtí sin imní orm. Tá go leor scéimeanna, clár agus tionscnamh ar fáil le gur féidir le gach duine feabhas a chur ar a shlándáil ar líne. Thig linn ciall do na comharthaí contúirte a fhoghlaim agus ciall don dóigh le caidreamh ar líne a dhéanamh le daoine ar bhealach cuí a fhoghlaim lenár gcoinneáil féin sábháilte ar líne. Obair nach bhfuil deireadh léi an obair chéanna, agus tá moladh tuilte acu siúd atá ag foghlaim dúinn an dóigh le fanacht sábháilte ar líne. Cé go bhfuil treoirlínte diana i bhfeidhm leis na rioscaí ar líne a laghdú, is orainne mar úsáideoirí deiridh atá an dualgas muid féin a choinneáil sábháilte agus gan bheith ag gabháil i dteagmháil le hábhar bréige ar cúis ghortaithe agus fuatha é. Fanaigí slán, bígí ar an airdeall, agus, ná bíodh leisce oraibh na cnaipí tuairiscithe a bhrú nuair is gá.
296 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- No identity-based framing was identified (0.86).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.03 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.03 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.23 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.03 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 0.86 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.14 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.58 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.28 |
| Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups | 0.08 |
| Another identity-related subject | 0.03 |
| Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues | 0.02 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:56 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.