Debate contribution: Clonoe Inquest Findings
Debate contribution by Mr Jonathan Buckley on .
- MLA
- Mr Jonathan Buckley
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 10 February 2025
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Matter of the Day
- Heading
- Clonoe Inquest Findings
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4790209
Read the official Assembly record
Text
There is significant hurt in Northern Ireland today as a result of the ruling. On many occasions, Members from all communities have come to the House and highlighted cases of injustice, hurt and pain. This is not one of those. The men who set out that night had one intention: to take innocent life. The east Tyrone brigade was responsible for murder and mayhem across Northern Ireland, across the community that I come from and have lived in all my life. In 1991, my great-uncle, Lance Corporal Bobby Crozier, went to his place of work, Glenanne army barracks, only to have an IRA bomb put down the side of a hill, killing him and his colleagues in an instant. No inquiries, no inquests, no justice. His loved ones: two young girls were left with no father; a wife with no husband. Those were the callous actions of the Provisional IRA. Those were the callous actions that many Members of Sinn Féin in the House set out to justify not just on this occasion but on many others. I can say this: I am extremely proud of and believe that our society is fortunate to have had the intervention of the security forces on many occasions; on this occasion, the SAS. Not just at Clonoe but at Loughgall and on many other occasions when terrorists set out to take life, they were met by real soldiers. Every time we come to the lawfare that is being pushed on us by some in the media and some in the judiciary, they fail to mention this simple fact: had the terrorists not set out to take innocent life, they would have their lives today. We have to set this in context, because this is not justice; this is lawfare. Those were not victims or innocents; they were terrorists. Sinn Féin talks about hypocrisy, but there was no engagement from Sinn Féin with the inquiry into Kingsmills, where men were butchered on the side of the road. Sinn Féin has sat silently in every other sphere. Perhaps it is time that it looked at its own ranks —
— in particular those like Gerry Adams, who sent many of their young men to die — and for what?
So that they could sit in the Assembly in cosy, warm rooms.
386 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism
Jev’s structured answers met every documented threshold for a qualifying culture-war activity.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.85 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
- Criteria met: Identity framing (0.78); Dog-whistle messaging (0.76).
- The text adopts the identity-based framing in its own voice (0.87).
- Subject area: Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism.
- The text adopts an antagonistic or dog-whistle framing, which qualifies even alongside legitimate scrutiny.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.78 | Yes |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.50 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.04 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.76 | Yes |
| Controversy escalation | 0.28 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.09 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.85 | Above qualifying threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing | 0.10 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.03 |
| Adopts it (chosen) | 0.87 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism | 0.91 |
| Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations | 0.09 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.00 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:55 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.