Debate contribution: Supporting Learning Pathways for our Young People

Debate contribution by Mr Paul Givan on .

MLA
Mr Paul Givan
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
4 February 2025
Type
Debate contribution (made as a minister)
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Supporting Learning Pathways for our Young People
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4779603

Read the official Assembly record

Text

That leads me on to my next point. The Member is right: pupils have to get the correct advice. The advice at school when I was there was, "Join the police", "Become a teacher" or, "Go into the health profession". It was not the kind of careers advice that we need to be providing to our young people. It is important that we support schools and those who provide that advice. Careers advisers and others should therefore have access to schools to discuss progression pathways with learners. There is an onus on the Careers Service to support learning pathways. I call on the Minister for the Economy to ensure that the service is appropriately resourced to provide up-to-date, relevant and timely advice to our pupils in schools. It has also been suggested that schools are offering courses that would be better taught in FE colleges. In fact, there are several approval processes in place to ensure that the qualifications being offered in a school are appropriate for that setting. They include the carrying out of checks by the awarding organisations; legislation requiring that qualifications being taught in school be approved by the Department; and, for large-sized qualifications, an application from the school, by exception, to offer that course to particular learners. In providing funding to schools for sixth-form pupils, the Department expects them to support those learners at every stage of their two-year learning journey. Only in very exceptional circumstances should a school end a pupil's sixth-form placement at the end of year 13. For some time, employers have been expressing concerns about a skills gap, which is the shortfall between what they expect and need from their recruits and the skill set with which those recruits come to them. The broadly based offer in sixth form has a key role to play in addressing the skills gap. In today's fast-changing, interdisciplinary, connected and collaborative world, we need breadth as well as depth: the ability to take learning from one context and apply it to another. The range of subjects on offer to post-16 students, the mix of academic and vocational options and the range of extracurricular choices equip learners with a more rounded set of skills and perspectives that are ideally suited to the flexible, evolving careers that will be inevitable over the next 10 years and beyond. As our economy develops, the demand for higher levels of skills and knowledge will continue to grow. It is critical that we support as many young people as possible to reach the education and qualification levels that will offer viable and sustainable opportunities in our emerging labour market. If we want an education system in which all children have the chance to make the most of their abilities and become the best version of themselves, we need to invest in their learning. Investing in our schools is an investment in the future of Northern Ireland.

484 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.02 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.93).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.02No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.01No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.02No
Controversy escalation0.02No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.93Yes
Overall judgement0.02At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.89
Education structures, integration and community division0.10
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:53 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification