Member's statement: Lá Idirnáisiúnta an Fhuinnimh Ghlain
Member's statement by Miss Nicola Brogan on .
- MLA
- Miss Nicola Brogan
- Party at the time
- Sinn Féin
- Date
- 28 January 2025
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Lá Idirnáisiúnta an Fhuinnimh Ghlain
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4763520
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Rinneadh Lá Idirnáisiúnta an Fhuinnimh Ghlain a cheiliúradh Dé Domhnaigh. Tá Sinn Féin go mór i bhfách leis an straitéis fuinnimh mar a aontaíodh í in 2022. Is leis an straitéis sin a bhainfear an fuinneamh glan amach. Foilsíodh tuarascáil i mí an Mhárta anuraidh, tuarascáil inar leagadh amach na cúig bhunphrionsabal leis an neodracht carbóin a bhaint amach faoin bhliain 2050 agus le hastaíochtaí ón fhuinneamh a laghdú. Focal mór agus dea-chur leis, sin atá de dhíth anois. Molaimid an obair atá grúpaí tras-rannacha a dhéanamh le comhar agus cumarsáid a chur chun cinn idir na Ranna uile. Tá an obair sin riachtanach le treoir a thabhairt, le beartais a cheapadh agus le moltaí a dhéanamh sna pleananna gníomhaíochta gach bliain d’fhonn na cuspóirí a bhaint amach. Ní mór an chóir shóisialta agus an comhionannas bheith chun tosaigh san aistriú chuig an inbhuanaitheacht. Cothú na córach, próiseas cóir.
149 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.68).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.03 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.03 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.68 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.03 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.76 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.17 |
| Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues | 0.03 |
| Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups | 0.03 |
| Another identity-related subject | 0.01 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:52 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.