Debate contribution: Democratic Consent Resolution

Debate contribution by Mrs Naomi Long on .

MLA
Mrs Naomi Long
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
10 December 2024
Type
Debate contribution (made as a minister)
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Democratic Consent Resolution
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4716608

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I will walk through a Lobby tonight on the basis of what I believe and stand for. You are no more the DUP's little helper than I am anybody else's little helper. The Member would do well to extend to other people the courtesy that he would expect to be extended to him. I find it outrageous that I have been accused of being a nationalist or a republican tonight, just as I would find it outrageous to be accused of being a unionist or a loyalist.

87 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.46 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • Criteria met: Identity framing (0.79); Controversy escalation (0.66).
  • The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.85).
  • Subject area: Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.79Yes
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.04No
Cultural grievance politics0.14No
Dog-whistle messaging0.10No
Controversy escalation0.66Yes
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.04No
Overall judgement0.46Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.14
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it (chosen)0.85
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.65
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.31
Another identity-related subject0.03
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.01
No identity-related subject0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:46 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification