Debate contribution: Democratic Consent Resolution

Debate contribution by Mr David Brooks on .

MLA
Mr David Brooks
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
10 December 2024
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Democratic Consent Resolution
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4716235

Read the official Assembly record

Text

Does the Member accept that the protocol and the framework are the result of his and other Members' attempts to thwart democracy and not to honour the referendum, rather than of Brexit? Brexit has been achieved in other parts of the United Kingdom but has not been delivered here, largely because of the lobbying of those on the Benches opposite.

60 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.48 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.75).
  • Subject area: Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.39No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.14No
Cultural grievance politics0.03No
Dog-whistle messaging0.35No
Controversy escalation0.22No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.13No
Overall judgement0.48Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.75
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.24
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.85
No identity-related subject0.15
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:45 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification