Debate contribution: Democratic Consent Resolution

Debate contribution by Mr Philip McGuigan on .

MLA
Mr Philip McGuigan
Party at the time
Sinn Féin
Date
10 December 2024
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Democratic Consent Resolution
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4716093

Read the official Assembly record

Text

The Member said that he is a proud Northern Irish man, but his concerns seem to be about businesses in GB. How does he react to businesses in the North when we look at the export statistics published by HMRC that show that Scotland was down 13%, England was down 4·5% and Wales was down 9% from June 2023 to June 2024, while, here in the North, business exports were up 7%.

72 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.24 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.88).
  • Subject area: Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.16No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.05No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.15No
Controversy escalation0.23No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.40No
Overall judgement0.24At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.88
Reports or questions it0.04
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.08
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.43
Another identity-related subject0.42
No identity-related subject0.13
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.01
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:45 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification