Debate contribution: The draft Climate Change (Carbon Budgets 2023-2037) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2024

Debate contribution by Mr Andrew Muir on .

MLA
Mr Andrew Muir
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
10 December 2024
Type
Debate contribution (made as a minister)
Business
Executive Committee Business
Heading
The draft Climate Change (Carbon Budgets 2023-2037) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2024
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4715599

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I will respond later to many of the Member's points. Will he acknowledge, however, that the Minister who moved the legislation at First Reading, Second Reading and Final Stage was a DUP Minister? You should have a bit more respect for your colleague who introduced the legislation in the first place.

51 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.46 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • Criteria met: Controversy escalation (0.69).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.91).
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.34No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.04No
Cultural grievance politics0.06No
Dog-whistle messaging0.13No
Controversy escalation0.69Yes
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.05No
Overall judgement0.46Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.91
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.09
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.70
Another identity-related subject0.13
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.11
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.06
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:45 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification