Member's statement: Less Survivable Cancers Awareness Week 2025

Member's statement by Mr Stewart Dickson on .

MLA
Mr Stewart Dickson
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
13 January 2025
Type
Member's statement
Business
Members' Statements
Heading
Less Survivable Cancers Awareness Week 2025
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4737829

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I rise today to mark a very important week. Today marks the beginning of Less Survivable Cancers Awareness Week 2025. Across the world, six cancers make up those known as the less survivable cancers, namely stomach, oesophageal, liver, pancreatic, brain and lung. Those cancers have just a 16% survival rate. This week is a vital occasion that reminds us all of the realities faced by many individuals battling cancers that often go unnoticed and underfunded. This week is a time not just for reflection but for action, awareness and commitment to the fight against these cancers that take far too many lives. Statistics tell the harsh truth. Less survivable cancers, such as pancreatic, liver and oesophageal, not only bear a heavy emotional weight on those who have been diagnosed with them but place a significant burden on our healthcare systems and the families of those who have had that diagnosis. Unlike some of the more common cancers, these conditions often receive less public attention, resulting in diminished research funding and limited treatment options. It is our duty to shine a light on these cancers, ensuring proper funding and recognition. In December 2024, I marked a personal milestone, celebrating five years cancer-free following successful surgery for one of those less survivable cancers.

We know that early diagnosis, in the case of all cancers, gives the best chance for survival. Sadly, with the less survivable cancers, diagnosis is often made all too late, and the cancer is, therefore, much harder to treat. Over 20% of oesophageal cancer cases are diagnosed in emergency settings. Unfortunately, at that stage, the cancer has often progressed and cannot be treated. This week, I urge people to educate themselves and those around them, to promote awareness and to support organisations that prioritise the six less survivable cancers. This week is an opportunity to confront the stigma and to amplify the voices of those affected by less survivable cancers: stomach, oesophageal, liver, pancreatic, brain and lung. Let us strive for a future where no cancer is deemed to be less survivable. I commend all the charities that are dedicated to those cancers. We demand focus and attention from the Minister and the Department of Health. We want every individual faced with a diagnosis in Northern Ireland to be given the best chance to fight, survive and thrive. Thank you, on behalf of all the amazing charities that support less survivable cancers, such as OGCancerNI (Oesophageal and Stomach), Pancreatic Cancer UK, Guts UK, Liver Cancer UK, Brainwaves NI and the Roy Castle Lung Cancer Foundation.

426 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.02 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.68).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.02No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.01No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.01No
Controversy escalation0.02No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.68Yes
Overall judgement0.02At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.62
Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits0.36
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.01
Another identity-related subject0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:42 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification