Member's statement: Díothú an Fhoréigin in aghaidh na mBan
Member's statement by Miss Nicola Brogan on .
- MLA
- Miss Nicola Brogan
- Party at the time
- Sinn Féin
- Date
- 25 November 2024
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Díothú an Fhoréigin in aghaidh na mBan
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4674535
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Inniu an Lá Idirnáisiúnta um Dhíothú an Fhoréigin in aghaidh na mBan. Maraítear bean amháin gach 10 mbomaite. Nuair a léigh mé an fíoras sin, a Cheann Comhairle, baineadh stad asam: maraítear bean amháin gach 10 mbomaite. Phléigh muid go min agus go minic sa Teach seo an foréigean in aghaidh na mban. Chuala muid uilig go léir na scéalta agus na staitisticí. Táimid uilig ar aon tuairim gur gá rud éigin a dhéanamh faoin fhadhb seo, agus ina dhiaidh sin féin, leanann an foréigean ar obair gan chosc gan cheangal. Is é rud a shíleann daoine go fóill gur rud fánach é an foréigean in aghaidh na mban. Cá bhfuil mar a shílfeadh duine ar bith sin, a Cheann Comhairle, nuair atá na Náisiúin Aontaithe á rá linn go maraítear bean amháin gach 10 mbomaite? Déantar mná a ionsaí sa bhaile, san ionad oibre agus ar líne - is cuma cén aois a bhfuil na mná sin ann. Is annamh a thugann siad tuairisc ar na hionsaithe do na póilíní. Ní ligeann an náire dóibh tuairisc a thabhairt, agus creideann cuid mhaith acu gur beag an difear a dhéanfadh sé cibé. Is geal liom go bhfuil straitéis anois againn le deireadh a chur leis an fhoréigean in aghaidh cailíní agus na mban. Déanaimid ár ndícheall daoine a chur ag caint ar fhadbanna sláinte agus intinne. Caithfimid an rud céanna a dhéanamh anois leis an fhoréigean in aghaidh na mban. Abraimis amach. Ní binn béal ina thost. Maraítear bean amháin gach 10 mbomaite. Níl sé inleithscéil.
256 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.06 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.67).
- No identity-based framing was identified (0.89).
- Subject area: Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.15 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.03 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.03 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.04 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.67 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.06 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 0.89 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.11 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups | 0.57 |
| Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues | 0.43 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.00 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:38 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.