Debate contribution: Climate Change
Debate contribution by Mr Gerry Carroll on .
- MLA
- Mr Gerry Carroll
- Party at the time
- People Before Profit Alliance
- Date
- 11 November 2024
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Ministerial Statements
- Heading
- Climate Change
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4667751
Read the official Assembly record
Text
On a point of order, Madam Principal Deputy Speaker. I believe that, at Question Time, the Education Minister misled the House by saying that the House did not pass a motion last week calling for him to review the eligibility criteria for the RAISE programme. The motion, which was passed last week:
"calls on the Minister of Education to urgently review the criteria for the targeting of the RAISE programme". — [Official Report (Hansard), 5 November 2024, p43, col 2].
To my and anybody else's reading, that sounds like the House asked him to review it. Can I ask for the record to be corrected in that regard?
108 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.02 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.01 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.01 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.04 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.25 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.03 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.69 |
| Education structures, integration and community division | 0.20 |
| Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits | 0.11 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:35 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.