Debate contribution: Holiday Hunger and the High Cost of School Uniforms

Debate contribution by Mr Danny Baker on .

MLA
Mr Danny Baker
Party at the time
Sinn Féin
Date
12 November 2024
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Holiday Hunger and the High Cost of School Uniforms
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4658730

Text

I thank the Members who tabled the motion, which is very important. It was debated in recent months, and, during that time, our community and voluntary sector has been doing the heavy lifting.

Great work is being done by Monkstown Boxing Club and the Lagmore Youth Project, for example. During the summer, I volunteered at Lagmore and ran an eight-week programme. It was to help with holiday hunger — not that any of the children who were participating in the programme knew what it was about. We were able to have it in a Belfast city park, where we had access to play facilities and the pitch. We had fun and games, but we were putting food in their wee bellies. There is deprivation in every part of society. All of us have those issues coming into our constituency offices, but it hits home when you are at the coalface, volunteering. One of the children was pocketing food, on the side, because he wanted to bring it home for his older sister. If we work together, we can make a difference and most certainly protect the most vulnerable children in society, even with our constrained budgets. It is important that we do that. That is why I have proposed a Member's Bill that aims to tackle holiday hunger and ensure that no child goes hungry. The cost-of-living crisis has deepened, and we are all feeling it in our pockets. Society is feeling it, and we want to help as many people as possible, but it hits a lot harder for some than for others. My Bill seeks to ensure that children who are in receipt of free school meals will continue to get that security during the holiday breaks through direct payments to their families. The provision of free school meals enables many children to access a nutritious meal, which, in some cases, will be their main meal of the day. That brings with it a range of physical and mental benefits, as well as educational benefits. The links between educational underachievement and deprivation are well known. Evidence suggests that some children returning to school from weeks or months of holiday are intellectually behind classmates who have had access to a wholesome diet during the school holidays. Legislation is needed, now, to make a long-term commitment so that children who need free school meals, and their families, are supported to ensure that they get the nutrition that they need to help fulfil their potential. The Minister will be aware that, due to the cuts imposed from London, our education system has limited resources. We should be targeting that additional funding to where it is needed the most. Unfortunately, based on my correspondence with the Minister, I know that he has no intention of legislating to end holiday hunger. Hopefully, that has changed. Much work is needed in the time ahead. A number of important steps need to be taken, including encouraging children and young people who are entitled to a free school meal to avail themselves of it. The Minister should, urgently, publish his Department's review of the eligibility criteria for free school meals and uniform grants. Sinn Féin looks forward to responding to that review, and we are open to exploring all the options for increasing the number of children and young people who are able to access free school meals and uniform grants. The Minister's announcement of an interim change to the eligibility criteria for families applying for free school meals and uniform grants was a welcome step in the right direction and will help workers and families to access support. Tackling poverty and social exclusion and patterns of deprivation, based on objective need, is woven into the Good Friday Agreement, and legislating to end holiday hunger is underpinned by that principle. I fully accept that ending holiday hunger for only those children who are in receipt of free school meals will not go far enough. However, it is a fundamental first step that must be taken on the journey to addressing child poverty and meeting objective need. As I said, by working together, we can help to assure families, ease that pressure and ensure that no child goes hungry, no matter the time of year. The consultation and survey on my Member's Bill have gone live today. I would like Members to help out and contribute by filling in the survey. I look forward to working with everybody on the Bill.

744 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not qualifying

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not qualifying”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.96).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-qualifying threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.03No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.02No
Controversy escalation0.02No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.96Yes
Overall judgement0.03At or below not-qualifying threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.68
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.10
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.09
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.04
Education structures, integration and community division0.04

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:33 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification