Debate contribution: EU Relationship

Debate contribution by Mr Jonathan Buckley on .

MLA
Mr Jonathan Buckley
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
18 November 2024
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Opposition Business
Heading
EU Relationship
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4655894

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I thank the Member for giving way. He talks about the respect of all communities. The Belfast Agreement put at its heart cross-community voting in this place. Does the Member not have any concern or, indeed, remorse about the fact that there will be no cross-community vote on the democratic scrutiny motion in the coming weeks?

56 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.26 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.97).
  • Subject area: Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.21No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.06No
Dog-whistle messaging0.06No
Controversy escalation0.22No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.37No
Overall judgement0.26At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.97
Reports or questions it0.02
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.51
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.43
No identity-related subject0.04
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.01
Another identity-related subject0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:31 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification