Member's statement: Commonwealth Games: Glasgow 2026

Member's statement by Mr Stephen Dunne on .

MLA
Mr Stephen Dunne
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
22 October 2024
Type
Member's statement
Business
Members' Statements
Heading
Commonwealth Games: Glasgow 2026
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4607983

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I am pleased to welcome the news today that the Commonwealth Games are set once again to be hosted by Glasgow in 2026. That secures the future of those prestigious games, which were in real jeopardy following a number of setbacks, with the Australian state of Victoria pulling out late in the day from hosting the games. Often referred to as the "friendly games", the Commonwealth Games were first held in 1930 in Canada. Northern Ireland has competed in 19 of the 21 Commonwealth Games, beginning with the second games, which were held in 1934. Our wee country has achieved an incredible 142 medals at the games. A total of 3,000 athletes from up to 74 of our Commonwealth nations and territories are expected to compete at the 2026 games across a new, compact 10-sport programme. The Commonwealth Games provide the only opportunity for our local athletes to represent Northern Ireland while competing at international level in a multi-sport event. It is welcome that our aspiring athletes will again have that opportunity. Team Northern Ireland has always punched well above its weight at the Commonwealth Games, and the 2026 games represent a fantastic opportunity to build on the success of the 2022 games in Birmingham, at which our athletes won a record 18 medals. We saw in the summer the success of our golden Olympic heroes, including Rhys McClenaghan and Daniel Wiffen, who both won medals at the 2022 games in Birmingham. That clearly demonstrates the pathway to success that is available to all. Many of our most decorated athletes, including Lady Mary Peters, enjoyed success at the Commonwealth Games: long may that continue. The games are an incredible opportunity for athletes from across Northern Ireland to compete at an elite level in so many sports, including athletics, boxing, netball, swimming, gymnastics and other sports that we have excelled in for many generations. I wish Team Northern Ireland — Conal and the whole team — all the very best, as they can now plan and train with certainty for the 2026 Commonwealth Games.

343 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.02 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • Subject area: Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.04No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.01No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.02No
Controversy escalation0.03No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.05No
Overall judgement0.02At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies0.91
No identity-related subject0.05
Another identity-related subject0.03
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:26 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification