Member's statement: Fermanagh and South Tyrone: Rural Crime
Member's statement by Mrs Deborah Erskine on .
- MLA
- Mrs Deborah Erskine
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 15 October 2024
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Fermanagh and South Tyrone: Rural Crime
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4592459
Read the official Assembly record
Text
In recent weeks, there has been a marked increase in rural crime, including agricultural machinery theft, in Fermanagh and South Tyrone. The effect of that on farmers and the rural community is devastating. As I have said many times in the Chamber, many in our farming communities are at breaking point. Costs have risen, and poor weather has contributed to a perfect storm in farming communities. Then, the actions of a few thieves who come along and destroy a farm operation causes added stress to farming families. That is deplorable. This weekend saw a number of separate thefts of agricultural machinery. Between September and October, a high volume and value of machinery has been stolen, including tractors, quad bikes, power tools, a topsoil screening machine and strimmers. Damage was also caused to an excavator. The PSNI is asking the community to be vigilant and to ensure that they secure their property on rural farms. Recently, I met the PSNI locally. We discussed the recent spate of agricultural thefts. Yesterday morning, I spoke to the police about incidents over the weekend. Police have urged the public to take up the offer of policing and community safety partnership (PCSP) trailer marking to act as a deterrent, ensure that CCTV is in working order, keep machinery stored safely away at night and, most importantly, report any suspicious activity or incidents of theft. They appeal to anybody with information — I appeal to them from the Chamber today — to bring that information to the police. If you see suspicious activity, please report it, because it may be crucial in helping to catch those responsible.
271 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.02 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.01 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.02 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.47 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.03 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.98 |
| Another identity-related subject | 0.02 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:26 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.