Member's statement: Glór na Móna
Member's statement by Ms Aisling Reilly on .
- MLA
- Ms Aisling Reilly
- Party at the time
- Sinn Féin
- Date
- 21 October 2024
- Type
- Member's statement (made as a minister)
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Glór na Móna
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4603417
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Ba mhaith liom aird a dhíriú ar eagraíocht phobail Ghaeilge i mo thoghlach, Glór na Móna, atá ag céiliúradh 20 bliain ar an fhód. Eagraíocht phobail agus óige Ghaeilge í Glór na Móna a bunaíodh sa bhliain 2004 le deiseanna oideachais agus sóisialta a chur ar fáil do phobal Gaeilge Chluanaí uachtair. Ó bunaíodh í, tá scoth na hoibre déanta ag Glór na Móna. Bíonn siad ag obair leo ag eagrú ranganna Gaeilge, club óige, scéimeanna samhraidh, Fhéile na Carraige agus Fhéile na gCloigíní Gorma, agus níl iontu sin ach cuid de na rudaí a bhíonn idir lámha acu. Ní hé amháin go mbíonn gníomhaithe Ghlór na Móna ar a ndícheall ag cur seirbhísí Gaeilge ar fáil i gCluanaí uachtair, bíonn siad i mbun feachtais ar fud na cathrach: d’imir siad ról lárnach in An Dream Dearg, agus bhí ról acu fosta ag déanamh cumann neamhspleách de chuid Chumann Lúthchleas Gael de Laochra Loch Lao. Arís, níl sa mhéid sin ach cuid de na héachtaí atá curtha i gcrích acu. Comhghairdeas libh, a chairde: bhí Féile na Carraige eagraithe go hiontach agaibh i mbliana, le himeachtaí thar a bheith suimiúil. Bhí ócáid chéiliúrtha den scoth eagraithe agaibh i Halla na Cathrach, agus ba mhór an pléisiúr liom bheith libh oíche Shathairn. Tá bród orm bheith i mo bhall de phobal na Gaeilge. Go maire sibh an chéad 20 eile bliain.
230 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.05 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- No identity-based framing was identified (0.97).
- Subject area: Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.10 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.05 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.03 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.05 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.05 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 0.97 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.03 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 1.00 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.00 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
| Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:23 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.