Debate contribution: Children’s Hospice: Funding

Debate contribution by Ms Sian Mulholland on .

MLA
Ms Sian Mulholland
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
14 October 2024
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Children’s Hospice: Funding
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4590251

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I recognise the essential role that the Northern Ireland Children's Hospice plays in the lives of children with life-limiting conditions and the families who love and care for them. The hospice provides not only critical palliative care for those children but much-needed emotional and practical support for families navigating the most challenging circumstances, as my extended family, unfortunately, has had to know. The service is not just vital; it is absolutely irreplaceable. We know, however, that the hospice faces enormous financial pressures driven by rising costs and inflation. It is deeply concerning that a service that provides such crucial care to our most vulnerable children has to rely on charitable donations to survive. The Government must take responsibility for ensuring that care is funded sustainably and consistently year after year. We propose that children's palliative care should be formally recognised as a core part of the Health and Social Care system with guaranteed funding that keeps pace with inflation so that the burden of fundraising does not fall on the hospice or the families who depend on it. The Northern Ireland Children's Hospice receives £1·9 million in core funding from the Department of Health, alongside that one-time payment of £85,000, yet rising costs, particularly due to inflation, have not been matched by that funding. As a result, the reduction in the number of beds that it offers represents a heartbreaking reality for children and families who need the hospice most. The hospice is the only service of its kind. There is nowhere else in Northern Ireland for them to go. It requires an investment to continue its life-saving work. If we look at how children's palliative care is funded in other regions where Governments have stepped up in some way to support those essential services, we see that, in the past two financial years, the Scottish Government have covered Children's Hospices Across Scotland for up to 30% of its costs and the year before that it was 41·6 %. In Wales, they covered almost 20%, and, in England, they covered over 30%. In Northern Ireland, it is less than 10%. Those examples show that children's hospices in Great Britain are recognised as a fundamental part of healthcare, not just as optional charitable services. Northern Ireland must adopt that approach, but we are not there yet. While the £85,000 cut from the Northern Ireland Children's Hospice's budget was reinstated for the rest of the financial year, the hospice faces significant financial pressure. Even with that core funding being guaranteed annually, it is not enough to meet the rising demand and costs. Without long-term, sustainable financial solutions, the hospice will continue to face the threat of cutting services, which no family relying on that care should ever have to hear about or worry about during that time. We cannot lose sight of the fact that behind the numbers that we are talking about are children and families who are already facing unimaginable challenges that no parent or child should ever have to face. They should never have to consider the added worry of whether a hospice will be in a position to provide care for their dying child. The Northern Ireland Children's Hospice brings dignity, compassion and comfort to those families in their most vulnerable moments, and it is our duty as public representatives to ensure that the hospice has the financial support that it needs to continue that vital work. I call on the Minister of Health to make that long-term sustainable funding a priority and a permanent commitment, not a temporary solution or sticking plaster. My party, for its part, will continue to push for comprehensive funding that will allow the hospice to focus on what matters most: caring for children and families, not fundraising.

625 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.02 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.97).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • Subject area: Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.02No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.01No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.01No
Controversy escalation0.02No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.97Yes
Overall judgement0.02At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits0.70
No identity-related subject0.28
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.02
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:21 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification