Debate contribution: Planning Appeals Commission: Resources
Debate contribution by Mr Stephen Dunne on .
- MLA
- Mr Stephen Dunne
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 30 September 2024
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Oral Answers to Questions
- Heading
- Planning Appeals Commission: Resources
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4563865
Read the official Assembly record
Text
I thank the Minister for the answer. It is widely recognised that the performance of the PAC is not where it needs to be, and I think that everybody will concur with that. What more can be done to improve its efficiency? I would also like an update on the Audit Office review, if that is possible.
57 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Part of an exchange
This follow-up belongs to: Oral question AQO 876/22-27.
Assessment
Not analysed
This is the same MLA’s follow-up within the exchange on their own question. It is analysed together with that question and is not counted separately, so one question is never counted twice.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.