Member's statement: Football: Jonny Evans

Member's statement by Mr Phillip Brett on .

MLA
Mr Phillip Brett
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
17 September 2024
Type
Member's statement
Business
Members' Statements
Heading
Football: Jonny Evans
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4536832

Read the official Assembly record

Text

As a proud son of north Belfast, a Manchester United fan and a Northern Ireland fan, it gives me great pleasure to pay tribute to our retiring captain, Jonny Evans. Unfortunately for me, that is where the comparisons between me and Mr Evans end. Jonny played for Northern Ireland on 107 occasions, captaining the team since the retirement of Steven Davis. Jonathan made his debut for Northern Ireland in 2006 against Spain, as that famous song goes — Mr Speaker, you will know the result of that match — when Northern Ireland claimed an historic 3-2 victory. Despite Jonathan winning the Champions League and Premier League with Manchester United, on his retirement, he said that his proudest achievement in football was wearing the green shirt of Northern Ireland and representing his country. For me, that is what the Northern Ireland football team is all about. It brings people from all backgrounds and all traditions together under the unity of that badge, playing for and hoping to get the best result for our country. Jonathan never forgot his working-class roots in Newtownabbey. He never forgot those who helped him in his teenage years, and the fans will never forget him. Jonathan showed that, regardless of what part of Northern Ireland you come from — he came from one of the most socio-economically challenged constituencies in Northern Ireland and one of the most difficult wards — you can proudly represent your country. He should be an inspiration to any boy or girl anywhere in Northern Ireland and show that you can proudly wear the shirt of your country and that the whole of Northern Ireland will always be behind you.

278 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.98).
  • Subject area: Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.10No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.01No
Cultural grievance politics0.03No
Dog-whistle messaging0.02No
Controversy escalation0.04No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.02No
Overall judgement0.03At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.98
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.01
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies0.72
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.21
Another identity-related subject0.04
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.03
No identity-related subject0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:06 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification