Member's statement: Gerry McLaughlin
Member's statement by Mr Maurice Bradley on .
- MLA
- Mr Maurice Bradley
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 17 September 2024
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Gerry McLaughlin
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4536819
Read the official Assembly record
Text
I will speak about the sad loss of a friend and former council colleague, Gerry McLaughlin, who was laid to rest on Friday. The nature of this place and the short time available in which to organise meetings and deal with constituency matters greatly impinges on our ability to attend funerals and ad hoc events. Nevertheless, I record my sadness at his passing and my gratitude for having known Gerry for many years, long before he or I became councillors. Gerry McLaughlin is etched in my good-memories bank. I knew Gerry when he worked in Diamond sawmills and in the old Department of the Environment, long before I became a councillor. In fact, Gerry was the first person to shake my hand on the day that I was elected in a by-election. He had a reputation for helping his fellow workmates, while his record of working for all as a councillor was well known and appreciated. He was a tireless community worker. In his younger days, he was a leading member of Windsor Boys' Club in Coleraine, where he educated children in the art of boxing alongside the late Billy Murphy and the late John Harte. His love for his wife, Bernadette, and his family was unending. Bernadette was a shining star in his life, closely followed by his children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. I was privileged to play a small part when he and Bernadette renewed their marriage vows on their 50th wedding anniversary.
Gerry's late father served in the First World War and was severely injured, but, thankfully, he survived that terrible conflict and returned home. Gerry, in memory of his father, was one of the first, if not the very first, SDLP councillors to attend Remembrance Sunday. When he and I attended our first official Remembrance Sunday together in 1996, we also travelled to the Somme battlefields. Gerry McLaughlin was a kind, loving, loyal man whose word was his bond, and his integrity was beyond reproach. He was a gentleman, a family man. He had so many qualities, and I was proud to have known him as a friend. I have fond memories of our times in council. As two working-class guys, we had much in common and a friendship that rose above all else, especially politics. A few months back, Gerry and his daughter Stephanie visited my office. Right away, Gerry, despite his illness, adopted a boxing pose. We had a good laugh, a bit of craic, and, again, another memory was made that will never fade. Gerry will be greatly missed, not by just his family but by the many constituents whom he helped over the years. I, too, will miss Gerry. My life has been much richer for having known him, and I extend my deepest sympathy to his wife, Bernadette, children Donna, Cathy, Gerry, Colette, Dominic, Gemma, Stephanie, Gary, Richard, Amy and the late Louise and the immediate and extended family circle.
488 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not qualifying”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.02 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-qualifying threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.03 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.01 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.01 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.03 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.01 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.02 | At or below not-qualifying threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.20 |
| Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies | 0.19 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.16 |
| Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations | 0.14 |
| Another identity-related subject | 0.13 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:06 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.