Debate contribution: Skills Gaps
Debate contribution by Mr Conor Murphy on .
- MLA
- Mr Conor Murphy
- Party at the time
- Sinn Féin
- Date
- 23 September 2024
- Type
- Debate contribution (made as a minister)
- Business
- Oral Answers to Questions
- Heading
- Skills Gaps
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4544176
Read the official Assembly record
Text
As I said in response to previous questions, we are very conscious of the skills challenge. From all sectors of our economy, from large to very small businesses, everybody mentions the same issue, which is getting people and skills. When you go abroad, you find that the biggest attractions for people who come to invest here are people and skills. Those are our biggest assets, but we need to do more and to assist. There will be potential for economic growth to stagnate if we cannot get more people. Post-Brexit, we do not have access to foreign workers in the same way that we had prior to Brexit. In any case, we had an obligation to meet the challenge of having a large number of economically inactive people and get them back into the workforce. Some of that will be done through the childcare scheme, which will allow more people more affordable childcare and to access employment, training or education opportunities. We need to continue to press that. We do not have the resources that used to be in the Department for the Economy for that, but we allocated significant resources to it at the start of the summer. All the additional money that we got we put into skills, because it is the most crucial area, and we need others to work with us on that. We need to make sure that colleges and other skills providers are working as efficiently as they can across the sector and that businesses are contributing. They are the ones who are asking us to create pools of workers who are available for employment, and they need to work with us on that. There are, undoubtedly, challenges, and if we had more resources we could do an awful lot more, but we are working hard with all the actors that are in that sector to try to make sure that we get the best possible outcome.
323 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.79).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.02 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.01 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.02 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.79 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.03 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.47 |
| Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty | 0.28 |
| Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers | 0.21 |
| Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues | 0.02 |
| Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups | 0.02 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 11:06 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.