Debate contribution: Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery

Debate contribution by Mrs Naomi Long on .

MLA
Mrs Naomi Long
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
17 June 2024
Type
Debate contribution (made as a minister)
Business
Oral Answers to Questions
Heading
Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4496396

Read the official Assembly record

Text

My Department has had limited engagement to date with the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery, which was formally established on 1 May. The Commissioner for Investigations, Peter Sheridan, wrote to me in March to update me on the development of the commission and its operating model. In his letter, he offered to meet me to brief me more fully on those matters. That meeting took place on 4 June. The commission has also requested a meeting with my officials, which is due to take place next month. The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 places statutory duties on relevant authorities, including the PSNI and the Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland, to provide such information, documents and material as the commission may reasonably require to enable it to carry out reviews of deaths and other harmful contact during the period of the Troubles. I am aware that the commission has been engaging directly with those organisations on how those interfaces will be managed. There has also been some preliminary engagement with Forensic Science Northern Ireland and the legacy inquest unit in the Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals Service. My opposition to the legislation passed in Westminster and my concerns about the impact that it will have on the right of victims and survivors to access justice and on wider public confidence in the justice system remain. The justice organisations for which my Department has responsibility will, nevertheless, fully comply with any obligations now placed on them by the Act and will not seek to obstruct or frustrate in any way the delivery of truth or justice to those impacted most directly by the Troubles.

280 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.07 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.65).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • Subject area: Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.04No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.02No
Controversy escalation0.04No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.65Yes
Overall judgement0.07At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.96
No identity-related subject0.04
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 10:43 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification