Member's statement: Refugee Week
Member's statement by Ms Paula Bradshaw on .
- MLA
- Ms Paula Bradshaw
- Party at the time
- Alliance Party
- Date
- 17 June 2024
- Type
- Member's statement
- Business
- Members' Statements
- Heading
- Refugee Week
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4496170
Read the official Assembly record
Text
I wish to make a statement at the start of Refugee Week. Unfortunately, the number of people being displaced around the world has grown rapidly during this decade; in particular, the return of the Taliban to control in Afghanistan, the brutalities of war in and around Syria and, of course, Russia's appalling, illegal invasion of Ukraine have led to vast numbers of people having to flee and seek refuge. Seeking refuge is nobody's choice; it is forced on growing numbers of families around the world. Sadly, we can expect to see more of it, notably from sub-Saharan Africa, not least as natural resources become even scarcer due to a combination of war and climate change. Clearly, this presents challenges in countries receiving refugees too. Contrary to what we read on certain social media platforms, most people recognise the global issues and want to help. However, at a time of zero economic growth and with public services pushed to the limit, it is perhaps understandable that people will be more inclined to want to ignore the refugee crisis and focus on issues closer to home. This year, the theme of Refugee Week recognises that it is about our home, emphasising that we should not think of it as an either/or. If we feel that our public services are under so much pressure that they cannot handle a few thousand more people, the answer is that we need to relieve the pressure on our public services through reform and investment. Our home is, ultimately, global. In the end, we all share the same resources, the same climate and the same broad challenges. We need to be able to build a home in Northern Ireland in which we can deliver economic opportunity and better public services for those already here and extend the hand of friendship to those who have been displaced from the most terrifying of circumstances. Most directly, in the Assembly, we need to see the implementation of a new refugee integration strategy that highlights the need for intercultural exchange and tackling misinformation. That would need to be delivered alongside enhanced race relations work, including the need to end the attacks on innocent people and businesses, the like of which we saw, sadly, in my constituency last week. To that end, this morning, here in Stormont, we had a visit from members of the Young Syrian Voices group, hosted by Barnardo’s, which has played a key role in the vulnerable person resettlement scheme over the past decade since a brutal civil war broke out in Syria. That work includes befriending, tips on resettlement and meeting up with others who have suffered displacement. It is a reminder that we all need to support people who come here to make it their home. This is our planet, so we need to make it a more welcoming, secure and sustainable place for all.
479 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.05 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.71).
- The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.74).
- Subject area: Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.09 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.03 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.03 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.05 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.71 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.05 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing | 0.26 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it (chosen) | 0.74 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers | 1.00 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.00 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 10:38 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.