Debate contribution: Curraghinalt Project (Dalradian) Public Inquiry

Debate contribution by Mr Tom Buchanan on 20 May 2024.

MLA: Mr Tom Buchanan
Party at the time: Democratic Unionist Party
Date: 20 May 2024
Type: Debate contribution
Business: Oral Answers to Questions
Heading: Curraghinalt Project (Dalradian) Public Inquiry
Assembly identifier: Official Report component 4490745

Text

Does the Minister accept that it was inappropriate for the Planning Appeals Commission to suspend the start of the public inquiry, contrary to the publicly expressed views of the three referring authorities — namely DAERA, DFI Roads and the DFI planning authority — which believed that the public inquiry should commence this September?

53 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Part of an exchange

This follow-up belongs to: Oral question AQO 439/22-27.

Assessment

Not analysed

This is the same MLA’s follow-up within the exchange on their own question. It is analysed together with that question and is not counted separately, so one question is never counted twice.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification