Debate contribution: PSNI: Retirement Processes

Debate contribution by Mr Mike Nesbitt on 20 May 2024.

MLA: Mr Mike Nesbitt
Party at the time: Ulster Unionist Party
Date: 20 May 2024
Type: Debate contribution
Business: Oral Answers to Questions
Heading: PSNI: Retirement Processes
Assembly identifier: Official Report component 4490725

Text

I thank the Minister for that answer. At a policy level, does she agree that it is counter-intuitive for the Policing Board, which is, after all, a scrutiny body, to get involved in service delivery, as is the case with injury on duty and ill health retirement applications?

48 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Part of an exchange

This follow-up belongs to: Oral question AQO 438/22-27.

Assessment

Not analysed

This is the same MLA’s follow-up within the exchange on their own question. It is analysed together with that question and is not counted separately, so one question is never counted twice.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification