Debate contribution: Autism (Amendment) Act (Northern Ireland) 2022
Debate contribution by Mr Danny Donnelly on .
- MLA
- Mr Danny Donnelly
- Party at the time
- Alliance Party
- Date
- 30 April 2024
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Private Members' Business
- Heading
- Autism (Amendment) Act (Northern Ireland) 2022
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4487633
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Thank you, Minister. I also pay tribute to Pam Cameron of the DUP for her work in the previous mandate on sponsoring the Bill that became the Act that we are discussing. The 2011 and 2022 Acts represented landmarks in cross-departmental planning and delivery across adult and children's services. The next step is the full implementation of the 2022 Act, and I welcome the motion's call for a road map for the Minister of Health to ensure his Department's compliance with both Acts. An important change provided for in the 2022 Act relates to the autism strategy. That provision included requiring the Department to take account of a wider range of perspectives and a more prevalent use of data. The autism strategy must now set out how training is:
"provided to the staff of Northern Ireland departments and other public bodies on how to best address the needs of— (a) persons with autism, and (b) the families and carers of persons with autism."
The autism strategy 2023-28 includes important commitments in that respect, including on how to support children in schools, training for teaching and academic staff and support for those who are in the workplace or seeking to enter it. One specific example relates to interview processes, which can be very stressful for many people. Those are encouraging points, but they are not accompanied by sufficient detail or statistics. That could be improved upon, given the provisions of the 2011 Act in sections 2(2) and 2(3A), made by the 2022 Act, which respectively require consultation with additional persons and appropriate additional data. Section 3 of the 2022 Act requires the autism strategy to:
"take into account best international practice on autism".
That is largely absent from the 2023-28 strategy. Other countries across the world have made significant progress, as have international organisations such as the World Health Organization. It is essential that the Department considers best practice elsewhere in order to improve our position in Northern Ireland. The appointment of an autism reviewer under section 5 of the 2022 Act has been mentioned. That remains an outstanding commitment; it has not been delivered. Having an autism reviewer for Northern Ireland would provide us with an important scrutiny mechanism. The reviewer could monitor the effectiveness of law and practice relating to autism. They would also be able to commission independent research, which would complement the requirement to take into account international practice. We have seen, through similar roles such as the Commissioner for Older People and the Commissioner for Children and Young People, how effective such positions can be. However, the delay in appointing an autism reviewer is concerning, given that the Act received Royal Assent in April 2022 and came into effect three months later. We need to see a time frame for appointing an autism reviewer who will be independent of the Department.
This is another occasion on which political instability and the absence of the Assembly and Executive have impacted on the delivery of key legislative commitments. There is a risk that the progress that we have made through the 2011 and 2022 Acts will be diminished by a failure to deliver, and the Minister must now do what he can to see the 2022 Act delivered in full.
There are huge waiting lists of up to five years for autism diagnosis. As the Member who moved the motion mentioned, there are few measurable targets in the autism strategy. There are poor outcomes for autistic people in Northern Ireland in education, employment and mental health. The employment rate for autistic adults is only 22%, which is the lowest for all disabilities. Autistic adults are nine times more likely to attempt suicide, and one in 20 children has an autism diagnosis. Those are obviously very serious issues that urgently need to be addressed.
I welcome the opportunity to speak on the motion, and I recognise the importance of the 2011 and 2022 Acts as well as the urgent need for their full delivery. I encourage the Minister to outline a road map towards implementation.
676 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.97).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- Subject area: Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.03 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.01 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.02 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.97 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.03 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits | 1.00 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.00 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 10:03 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.