Debate contribution: Historical Institutional Abuse Redress Board: Compensation Scheme
Debate contribution by Mr Stephen Dunne on .
- MLA
- Mr Stephen Dunne
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 29 April 2024
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Oral Answers to Questions
- Heading
- Historical Institutional Abuse Redress Board: Compensation Scheme
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 4485994
Read the official Assembly record
Text
I thank the First Minister for her answer. The Hart report ultimately found that abuse was widespread and recommended an apology and compensation, amongst other things. I share the welcome for the financial commitment from Barnardo's and the Good Shepherd Sisters. Does the First Minister agree that the remaining institutions need to do the right thing, step up and make a contribution?
62 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Part of an exchange
This follow-up belongs to: Oral question AQO 340/22-27.
Assessment
Not analysed
This is the same MLA’s follow-up within the exchange on their own question. It is analysed together with that question and is not counted separately, so one question is never counted twice.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.