Debate contribution: Display of Flags, Emblems and Banners

Debate contribution by Mr Mike Nesbitt on .

MLA
Mr Mike Nesbitt
Party at the time
Ulster Unionist Party
Date
30 April 2024
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Display of Flags, Emblems and Banners
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4487529

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I am a pretty poor body double for Tom. Some years ago, when FICT was established, I was asked to nominate an Ulster Unionist Party representative. I chose a councillor, a soldier, a man of action, and, for three years, listened to his frustration at the lack of progress. He has been trying to get his own back on me ever since.

62 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.27 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.99).
  • Subject area: Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.11No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.04No
Cultural grievance politics0.06No
Dog-whistle messaging0.09No
Controversy escalation0.25No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.03No
Overall judgement0.27At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.99
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.29
No identity-related subject0.27
Another identity-related subject0.21
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.10
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.08

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 10:02 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification